|
发表于 2021-5-5 14:06:06
|
显示全部楼层
That is a solid way of fact checking, but you can also tell the reviewer is a shill or a person with an interest with the girl in the way they make the recommendation. I read this review and it really is trying to persuade the reader that despite the provider being bad, it should be worth a visit.
"codester69:
Went there in evening, was tired but felt bad for cancelling last minute, so went ahead. I was going to leave if she wasn't at least a 7 (easy to be a 7+ with mask), or looked 35+, or whatever, I set a relatively high bar to not leave. I stayed.
F: 7.5 quite pretty. If you squint a bit when her mask is off, from the side, looks a bit like 蔡卓妍. The photos are absolutely not her, no question about it. I think she's around 28-31.
B: 7.5 perhaps mcot. She's not thin, she's not chubby (although I think guys who like really thin girls would call her chubby), height around 155 cm - 160 cm. Unshaved. My guess is she is a natural B with fake Ds, not saggy, quite nice, a bit hard though.
S: 9 very safe, one mask on. CBJ. SF2, with her outside. The fun part was like a 7 with all the restrictions, but left satisfied anyways and most importantly, didn't leave calculating stats on chances of catching the virus. It was quite safe, so didn't worry when I left, hence the 9.
A: 9 this is very subjective, some small talk here and there. I like to go in, do my business, and leave. She didn't cuddle or anything, the way I like it. Didn't smell smoke. If I wanted to cuddle, I think she will accomodate.
Repeat: no. In all my years of hobbying, I repeated only one girl once. No repeat from me doesn't mean it's bad.
Would I have gone a first time knowing what I know today? yes
The basics stats of a user account on this forum and whether a review is controversial or not, are not enough clues to determine if a shill or not. You have to read the intent behind the review as well.
Can you link the poster's other reviews please? |
|