Valerie @ Mirage Entertainment （***POLICE ALERT***）

FrankUnderwood

luckyone 发表于 2021-3-27 21:49
捧打出头鸟 老外店Mirage和亚裔店Moonwaiting都被扫过

Is that why Moonwaiting stopped using their Markham location for a couple of weeks?

I always felt that it was a matter of time before things would blow up at that building, with the keeper having to walk you to your appointment's door. Moonwaiting has a lot of practice being evicted from places, they are too obvious in the way they operate. Totally surprised that their yonge and finch location hasn't been busted since the hallways all have cameras there.

As for this hotel, the Park Inn by Radisson is an absolute shit hole. I have gone there to see providers before but I certainly would not be going there again.I have also had adventures dealing with pimps in that hotel. If you are concerned about privacy or problems with LE then I would stay away from there.

chessmaster

我1個月前到markham另一酒店時, 門外有警車, 大堂站著4名警察, 我若無其事在他們身旁行過, 再上樓. 進房後的45分鐘心裡一直不安, 完事後回到大堂, 他們已走了.

mmpleaser

This post is very informative and we have been warned.

But is it necessary to publish location name and not giving them some privacy?   I did go there many times too.  Once they had a very attractive front desk lady indeed.

marklee

Don’t go to those buildings,  you won’t be allowed, tried last Friday... security guards will ambush you

DDDaniel

看到警察还进去的 我只能说是真勇士。

k1231k

mmpleaser 发表于 2021-3-29 15:19
This post is very informative and we have been warned.

But is it necessary to publish location name ...

It's a public place so I posted it out (been here for other agency's girls before, can't remember). If that was a condo then I would't post.

wolfonyonge

mmpleaser 发表于 2021-3-29 15:19
This post is very informative and we have been warned.

But is it necessary to publish location name ...

According to the rules of this forum, for any issues as such, there must either be FULL DISCLOSURE of all pertinent details, or no mention at all.

With full disclosure, the reader can analyze all the given information, and use his own judgement to determine if it is to be believed or not.

Whereas, giving only partial information is unfair to all other parties who may have to share the suspicion.

For example: if I were to point to a group of 5 people and say, "ONE of them is a child molester, but either because I don't have sufficient proof, or to protect his privacy, I will not disclose which one". Well that just means 4 innocent people will now have to unfairly share the suspicion of being a child molester.

Giving only part of the picture is worse than not mentioning the picture at all. It is a coward's way of making a weaselly accusation without having to back it up.
If anyone doesn't have the courage or evidence to lay it all out on the line, then they shouldn't mention anything at all. The worst people are those who say stuff like, "I know something something but I can't really say it all... so I'll just drop hints or make vague assertions... so that when challenged I have leeway to hide behind".

Therefore, the reviewer did the right thing by giving us the whole story with full facts and details.

wonderfall

我離職前全公司男的都知道我嫖妓
還有同事一起去happy的也有
被抓就和樂融融 沒差反正單身

cchccd

不用担心警察搜你手机的。除非你自己答应

浪里个浪2019

楼主被吓尿了，我以前去找私做，出来等电梯的时候，正碰上警察出来，当时汗毛都竖起来了。