|
发表于 2016-12-23 15:03:08
|
显示全部楼层
The whole point of this review board is to garner ratings from those who have seen a particular SP. all I have done is compile them and provided what they say. Of course their are biases, just like there are biases when sports writers vote who is the most valuable player. Their is alway controversy at the end of the day. At least, one can make a better decision knowing these are what Leanna's clients have rated her. Yes they can be biased but that can apply to 100% of the SP's that are reviewed. You can only use data from those who have provided it. Of course there are probably hundreds of others who have seen her but have not provided a review. How does this differ from other SP's. It doesn't. Users of this board will use the reviews to decide whether or not they will see someone. Yes they can sift through all the BS of the hundreds and hundreds of posts and decide on their own. For someone to say what a lot of others are saying is irrelevant is ridiculous. Even her harshest critics rate her a 7.5 on looks. So why can't she be an 8 or 8.5. If you don't trust the reviews then don't see her.
And in regards to the meaningless comment, this was directed to those whose opinion do not match that of a larger group of people, the statistic is meaningless to them as an individual but could be meaningful to those deciding if they can should see her.
Statistics 101- as stated before, that is what this board is all about. Everyone has their personal preference. Compiling what a larger group of people think, regardless if they are at the two different extremes does not make the results irrelevant. Take out the top 10 upper and 10 lower scores. What do you get. Since you are the stats wiz, you tell me. |
|