|
发表于 2017-10-10 20:17:00
|
显示全部楼层
tchai 发表于 2017-10-10 01:03
C-Hing. Lay criminal charges is not by police. Only Attorney General could lay charge & bring crimin ...
Please do not 一知半解就扮專家.
The Attorney General of Canada (French: Procureur général du Canada) is a separate title held by the Canadian Minister of Justice (Ministre de la Justice), a member of the Cabinet. The Minister of Justice is concerned with questions of policy and their relationship to the justice system. In their role as attorney general, they are the chief law officer of the Crown.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attorney_general#Canada
There is only one attorney general for each province, plus one more for the country. They advise the government on major legal issues. The attorney general doesn't have time to look at all the cases happening everyday. It would be like thinking Walmart's CEO has to personally approve every sale everyday in every store across the country. The people who lay charges are court prosecutors, and they work closely with the police. So even though in theory the police don't lay charges, in reality they do have a major say in what the defendant gets charged with.
The prosecutors DO meet the defendants (note: until they are successfully convicted, they are called defendant, not criminal) for major crimes (felony) to make deals (plea bargaining). If its a minor crime (misdemeanor), then there is no meeting.
Alibis are NOT drafted by the police. That is illegal. If the cops did that, then it would get tossed out in court, and the cops would probably face punishment themselves.
If a john and a mm both got arrest, they would be questioned separately, and inconsistencies (which there surely will because there's no way the john and mm could plan a full detailed story together to explain how they met and what they were doing together) will be used as evidence against them. At the very least they can charge you with obstruction of justice for lying to the police.
By saying you gave a "donation", you already admitted to give money. The cops can make a case that the money was in exchange for sex. It doesn't matter what you call it. In fact some people have tried to argue that the money simply fell out of their pocket and the other person picked it up. Doesn't work. You can't just give some bullshit ridiculous story to explain your way out. Happens in movies, not real life.
"Law does not apply to guessing or presuming". Actually it does. The prosecution needs to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. The key word is "reasonable". If the judge finds what you tell him to be unreasonable, then you are guilty.
So lets see. The cops can easily prove that the girl was a prostitute from all the information on her cell phone plus evidence such as used condoms. The cops can also prove that you don't know this girl. Unless from now on every MM you see, before you start the session, you plan a long detailed alibi with her and make sure that she remembers the details correctly.
So if the cops can prove she is a prostitute, and you didn't know her previously but now you are at her place of work (sex work to be exact), and you admitted to giving her money (which you call donation). That is a pretty solid case against you.
Once again, remember that the prosecutor has to prove beyond a REASONABLE DOUBT. Key word is REASONABLE. You cannot expect the judge to find it reasonable that you somehow got yourself into a prostitute's place of work and gave her money (donation) for any reason other than to purchase sex.
Word games where you use one code word to mean another won't do you any good. The judge will accept the cops word as expert testimonial that "word A" is just coded language to mean "word B". In fact you are just making the prosecutor's job easier if you give smartass explanations like that. "Oh no your honour, I gave her a donation, not a payment." Thank you, and the court finds you guilty.
The main difference between a spa and a condo incall is that with a spa, you can make a reasonable case that you just mistakenly walked into what thought was a normal massage parlour, and that you were there to get a massage, not sex. With a condo incall you won't convince the judge that you accidentally walked in there, and if you try to make up a reason or excuse which the girl doesn't backup (remember that they will question you both separately) then you are finished. |
|