I tend to believe his descriptions and scores. Being honest is not the way to run this business. Mix good-looking girls and ordinary-looking girls with the same fabulously PSed photos. That's the right way to go because everyone is doing it. I don't blame BarbieHouse but I would be prudent when they couldn't have a girl taller than 1.65M......
I just double-checked the height of all the 10 girls @BarbieHouse. They're between 1.58 - 1.65m tall and most of them are at the lower end. Forget runway models taller than 1.75m... For print models, auto show girls and other girls making a living with their bodies, probably 1.65m height would be the minium requirement. I'm not saying you can't find a gem in girls shorter than 1.65M, but if all the ten girls are below 1.65m the only conclusion is probably the agency's recruiting is not going so well now....
matecheck 发表于 2016-6-17 20:34
I joined this thread basically I was disappointed with BH's recent girls. They once did have some ge ...
So are you saying abby, bunny, nana, and clara are not gem? Bh has standards for their own business operations, and lets be hibest this line of work is very buyer beware, you have shops blantely using dake pics, bait and switches. Over the years of being aerviced by bh, i firmly believe they are on the integrity side of doing business
All I gotta say is Bro you probably saved my wallet. I was gonna do a test tube run on this. But probably would have stepped on mine. But all the evening slots are taken so I thought to myself fate has it I can't see her tonight. Then there ya go
楼主: wing1
发表于 2016-6-17 19:57:26
楼主