有關性病指控 , 指控必須提供證據.

Apoc

Trial by Internet ...

These types of threads should never be allowed in the first place. They are career destroyer without the burden of proof. Just like the real court, it would have been thrown out of court outright without an ounce of evidence.

There should be a rule that any future claims of STD smear thread will not be allowed in this forum. If anyone puts out this type of threads, it will be Dead On Arrival and will be deleted!

密码码

Ada那帖连什么病都没说明，ED那帖很吓人，如果像图发展到那程度，時间上不止是2个礼拜。问了下医生，答案是个把月以上有了。这图是网上捉的吧？

babyme

Apoc 发表于 2016-12-7 23:01
Trial by Internet ...

These types of threads should never be allowed in the first place. They are c ...

Sir I repeatedly said it .

johnsonsh

这个是单方面需要证据，对方不需要证据证明没有，对方可以不方便出证明。完全不对等不公平。

肥狼

johnsonsh 发表于 2016-12-8 01:12
这个是单方面需要证据，对方不需要证据证明没有，对方可以不方便出证明。完全不对等不公平。 ...

一方在明一方在暗. 這樣又公平嗎?

一方打開門做生意, 任何壞消息都會有影響.

另一方無名無性, 可以無本錢無代價地信口開河, 就算謊話被揭穿了對他也沒影響.

兩邊本來就不公平.

肥狼

性病謠傳一出, 嚇得大家雞飛狗走, 生人勿近. MM就算馬上去驗, 等到報告出已經過了一大段時間. 已經損失慘重了. MM很多都想賺快錢, 不想等. 何況有了報告之後客人很多還會懷疑報告真假. 無論如何也對她生意大受打擊.

亦即是說, 就算MM能證明清白, 抹黑者的目標還是達到.

所以既然聲稱染病的人說有證據, 又聲稱想幫大家, 為什麼不肯出示證據呢?
證據可以不露名也不露臉, 不會曝露私隱. 拍兩照片放上忙也阻不了他幾分鐘. 他既有時間心機在線舌戰數天, 為什麼就是不肯出示證據? 連什麼病都說不出?

babyme

Currently seems like 2 areas are being blogged heavily.
One is the entertaining side, namely Last Breath,  and the other is not so entertaining STD.

Start with one,  Bro T is an very interesting guy, mind you to a lot of us, annoying.   But he does have a deep thought, especially on Human Psychology and no matter what his threats are, quite entertaining.
Please take it with a LARGE grain of salt about his cars, planes and possibly TRAINS too,  as well as his threats.

Second topic is really troubling.  I am not discounting Bro had an issue with STD.  Question is who gave it to him, is it serious.  Also could it be a smear without proof.  Anyone can accuse anyone, just like TRUMP got accused of all these sexual behavior and he EVEN threaten to sue all the girls with his might money wealth.
Sometimes I wonder if ADA really is a VICTIM too.  Both from smear and from whoever gave her in the first place.  She could not be born with STD right.  Now even if she wants to continue with this line of work, with our list of mm names on 747, she may not get on with a new name.  Even after she is cured with STD (assuming she did get it, which no one has any proof).   
My concern is this second discussion has no effect other than planting fear in hunting scene.  May be it is good that you all stay away, but not too long please.  I have the mm to pick from with no busy schedule.
But eventually no business for mm and no fun for me as they leave the scene.

Same as police activity.  If proven, no issue , good info.  But smears again, lies would not do anyone good.

Just thoughts.  Willing to take all stones from anyone.  I need some attention anyway  (just a joke).

Apoc

babyme 发表于 2016-12-8 00:16
Sir I repeatedly said it .

Well then, great minds think alike.

babyme

Apoc 发表于 2016-12-8 08:02
Well then, great minds think alike.

But corollary :  Fools seldom differ,    right?

TheRock

babyme 发表于 2016-12-8 10:04
But corollary :  Fools seldom differ,    right?

Fool or not, I agree with you.

Accusations without proof is never good. History shows these mass hysteria episodes, medieval witchhunts, Cold War era McCarthyism, and today's Islam-phobia, all lead to innocent victims being blamed and hurt/killed without helping solve the problem at all (if not to make it even worse).